4_5stars

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ47

single_review

 

 

The good: The Panasonic Lumix  DMC-FZ47 has excellent features, design, and shooting  performance.

The bad: For the $100 price drop from the FZ47′s  linemate, the FZ150, you lose a lot of features and get less-impressive shooting  performance and low-light photo quality.

The bottom line: The  Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ47 is a very good megazoom for the money, but if you want  more control over results–especially in low light–you’ll want to step up to  the Lumix FZ150.

Review:Editors’ note: Several of the features, shooting options, and  aspects of the design are identical between the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ47 and the Lumix  DMC-FZ150, so portions of our review of that camera are used again  here.The Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ47 makes a convincing argument for buying the Lumix  DMC-FZ150. That happened with its compact megazoom counterparts, the ZS8 and ZS10,  too. The FZ150′s MSRP is $100 more than the FZ47′s, but packs in a lot more  features, like a rotating LCD, a hot shoe for adding a flash, and an input for  an external mic as well as several of the features, shooting options, and  aspects of the design are identical between the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ47 and the Lumix  DMC-FZ150, so portions of our review of that camera are used again  here.

The Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ47 makes a convincing argument for buying the Lumix  DMC-FZ150. That happened with its compact megazoom counterparts, the ZS8 and ZS10,  too. The FZ150′s MSRP is $100 more than the FZ47′s, but packs in a lot more  features, like a rotating LCD, a hot shoe for adding a flash, and an input for  an external mic as well as raw capture, better shooting  performance–particularly burst shooting–and nicer low-light photos.

That’s not to say that the FZ47 is a bad camera; it’s definitely not. It has  a nice lens, fairly quick performance, and nice photo quality up to ISO 800,  depending on how picky you are about what photos look like at full size. If you  can find the FZ47 at a good price (I’ve seen it as low as $250), it’s a solid  choice and easy to recommend. But as with the ZS8, if you focus on what’s been  cut to get the price lower, you may decide to save up and spend the extra money.

Photo quality has improved from this camera’s predecessor, the FZ40.  If you’re a pixel peeper you probably won’t be thrilled with the noise and  artifacts you can see when photos are viewed onscreen at 100 percent. But unless  you’re planning to do a lot of enlarging and cropping and regularly make prints  above 8×10, you’ll likely be very happy with the results. Like most  point-and-shoots the FZ47 does well up to ISO 200, so the more light you give  it, the better your photos. However, ISO 400 is still good for small prints and  Web use, and so is ISO 800, as long as you don’t do much enlarging and cropping.  I’d stay away from ISO 1600, though, as colors desaturate and you’ll get a lot  of yellow blotching from color noise.

Color and exposure are very good. Colors are bright and vivid without looking  unnatural. Again, though, as you get to the FZ47′s two highest ISO sensitivities  there is a noticeable drop-off in color quality, particularly at ISO 1600.

As for movie quality, its AVCHD clips are sharp with good exposure and color  and some of the smoothest motion I’ve seen from a point-and-shoot. Low-light  recording suffers from the same noise problems as the photos. The zoom does  operate while recording, but its movement is picked up by the stereo mic, though  barely. If you are recording in a very quiet environment, you will hear it in  your movies, but otherwise it isn’t intrusive. The camera also has an option for  continuous AF for movies, which performed very well, as did its wind noise  filter. Also, the FZ47 can capture 3.5-megapixel photos while shooting video and  extract single frames for photos when in Playback mode.

 

There are no comments yet, add one below.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*